Supreme Court's guidelines for rape trials | Forum

Topic location: Forum home » Personal » Rape
LetsHelpIndia
LetsHelpIndia May 14 '14, 05:18



The Supreme Court of India laid down guidelines for the behaviour of defense lawyers in rape trials in a 1996 judgement. Unfortunately, these guidelines are not strictly followed today.


Below are a few excerpts from the judgement:


- The courts should examine the broader probabilities of a [rape] case and not get swayed by minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of prosecutrix.


- The court should not sit as a silent spectator while the victim of crime is being cross-examined by the defence. It must effectively control the recording of evidence.


- While every latitude should be given to the accused to test the veracity of the prosecutrix and the credibility of her version through cross-examination, the court must also ensure that cross-examination is not made as a means of harassment or causing humiliation to the victim of crime.


- It [an in-camera trial] would enable the victim of crime to be a little comfortable and answer the questions with greater ease in not too familiar surroundings. The improved quality of her evidence would assist the courts in arriving at the truth and sifting truth from falsehood.


The Forum post is edited by LetsHelpIndia May 14 '14, 05:21
shaiwal
shaiwal May 23 '14, 08:15

The quality of legal education is very bad in India .....particularly the advocates who are practicing in lower courts are know nothing about the jurisprudence of law , what is the purpose of law ...and all other real aspects of legal education . And lower courts are the fact finding courts , and these courts are not doing there duty to find the fact rather the manufacture the facts . The unqualified lawyers and even qualified lawyers are know only one thing i.e. Money . And even judges of lower courts are use to give decisions acording to bribe ......they decide the cases in favour of the person who bribe them more . And obviously in most of cases accused are the mighty person by power and money And victims are not equal to them . This becomes a fight between two unequals . And finally might is right. 

This is what actually our judicial system is.

on facebook

On Twitter